So much for that
28 January 2003 - 10:28 amOn second thought, was Kirk Cameron really ever that high to being with? Is it low to espose the benefits of finding jesus? People have done far less noble things. But, then let’s not get into a discussion of religion here.
Kirk definitely is up there on my top ten list of minor celebrities.
I watched Adaptation (IMDb, official) the other night. And I really enjoyed it - despite Meryl Streep’s histronics (greatest living acress, I think not). The plot of the movie is the movie itself, and all that. I thought, mistakenly, that I was being so clever in liking things self-aware and self-referential: 24 Hour Party People, Beavis & Butthead, WB teen dramas, etc. Mind you, I am not talking about Reba here.
Then a couple of nights ago, I was reading one of my increasingly large stack of New York Times Magazine back issues - the ones I never got around to reading while I was in Florida. This one from November or some time in the past when I didn’t apparently have much time. I find this article about things “Meta.” And this bothers me. Here I was, all sneaky, and then to find out that, not only am I not alone, but there is apparently a whole movement (or whatever it’s called) of people doing and liking the same thing. And there is a term for it - a term I don’t necessarily want to be associated with.
So much for that.